Document intelligence
Extracted information must remain traceable to its source.
Classify permitted files, propose facts and tables, preserve source context, and route important fields through human review before reuse.
Chain of custody
Admission, extraction, review, reuse
The source file and reviewer decision should remain inspectable throughout the document lifecycle.
- 01 / Admit
Validate the file
Confirm uploader authority, permission, type, size, malware status, version, date and retention context.
Exit: file admitted to the evidence boundary
- 02 / Extract
Propose structured fields
Classify sections and propose entities, figures, dates, claims, tables and summaries with location references.
Exit: candidate fields created
- 03 / Review
Accept or reject
A responsible reviewer compares candidate fields with the source and records corrections, limitations or exclusions.
Exit: review decision stored
- 04 / Reuse
Publish controlled context
Only accepted fields flow to assessment, drafting, reporting or presentation work with provenance attached.
Exit: approved downstream use
Evidence classes
Different files require different review questions
Classification should determine the review owner, validation rule, retention context and permitted downstream use.
| Ref | Work item | Required evidence or output | Owner | Control focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D-01 | Corporate material | Legal records, governance material, ownership, policies, agreements and authorization evidence. | Corporate reviewer | Permission + version |
| D-02 | Financial material | Statements, management accounts, forecasts, schedules, capitalization and operating metrics. | Finance reviewer | Period + reconcile |
| D-03 | Commercial material | Profiles, decks, customer context, market material, product descriptions and management assertions. | Commercial reviewer | Source + qualify |
| D-04 | Transaction output | Memos, reports, presentations, appendices, responses and prior reviewer comments. | Output owner | Status + audience |
Output boundary
A candidate fact is not an accepted fact
Confidence indicators, if used, must not replace source inspection or the responsible review decision.
- Candidate
- Machine- or rule-proposed field awaiting inspection.
- Accepted
- Reviewer-confirmed field with source location and limitations.
- Rejected
- Field excluded with a reason and retained audit context.
- Superseded
- Previously accepted field replaced by a newer reviewed source.
Important professional review notice
IBankCentral is a workflow, evidence organization, document generation, and analysis-support platform. Qualified professionals remain responsible for reviewing outputs before circulation or transaction reliance. IBankCentral does not provide legal, tax, audit, valuation, credit, regulatory, underwriting, or investment advice.