Company and market
Identity, model, positioning, customer evidence and operating maturity.
Deal assessment
A review file, not a readiness score.
Organize facts, assumptions, gaps, risk observations, specialist questions, and output implications into a reviewable assessment record.
Assessment file
Separate evidence from interpretation
Every observation should show its source context, reviewer, limitation and downstream consequence.
| Ref | Work item | Required evidence or output | Owner | Review action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-01 | Transaction fit | Objective, timing, structure, stakeholders, requested outputs and material constraints. | Deal lead | Frame |
| A-02 | Commercial evidence | Business model, customers, market context, operating indicators, dependencies and source limitations. | Commercial reviewer | Assess |
| A-03 | Financial evidence | Periods, statements, forecasts, assumptions, reconciliations, capitalization and missing schedules. | Finance reviewer | Assess |
| A-04 | Risk and gaps | Material inconsistencies, unsupported claims, governance issues, concentration and specialist dependencies. | Named reviewer | Escalate |
| A-05 | Output suitability | Evidence sufficiency and limitations for a profile, memo, presentation, report or appendix. | Release authority | Decide |
Assessment path
Challenge before conclusion
The intended control is a transparent chain from source material to reviewer judgment.
- 01 / Normalize
Frame the assessment
Confirm the transaction question, source perimeter, reviewer roles, required dimensions and intended output.
Exit: scope recorded
- 02 / Distinguish
Separate facts and assumptions
Mark accepted evidence, management assertions, estimates, conflicts, gaps and unverified external context.
Exit: evidence classes visible
- 03 / Challenge
Review material issues
Assign diligence questions, financial reconciliations, risk observations and specialist dependencies.
Exit: material items dispositioned
- 04 / Conclude
Record output implications
State what the evidence supports, what it does not support and who approved the conclusion.
Exit: review conclusion signed off
Dimension set
A structured lens with explicit limits
Financial and capital
Period coverage, performance, forecasts, assumptions, structure and reconciliation.
Readiness and risk
Documents, governance, dependencies, open questions, specialists and output constraints.
Quality rule
Do not compress uncertainty into a number
A flat score can hide missing evidence and conflicting judgments. The assessment should retain the reason, source, reviewer and limitation.
Useful decision support makes uncertainty inspectable; it does not make the decision appear automatic.
Important professional review notice
IBankCentral is a workflow, evidence organization, document generation, and analysis-support platform. Qualified professionals remain responsible for reviewing outputs before circulation or transaction reliance. IBankCentral does not provide legal, tax, audit, valuation, credit, regulatory, underwriting, or investment advice.